 |
| Canon |
 |
| OMD |
 |
| Canon |
 |
| OMD |
 |
| Canon |
 |
| OMD |
 |
| Canon |
 |
| OMD |
 |
| Canon |
 |
| OMD |
Didn't write down the exif, but basically each photo replica was taken using the same iso and aperture settings, left in Aperture Priority mode.
They say the Micro 4/3 sensor being smaller, produces a less creamy bokeh as compared to APSC and Full Frame. I never really scrutinised that, but looking at the pictures above, you can see there is a slight difference in bokeh, the OMD definitely has a less creamy bokeh than the Canon, especially with the shot of the pen and screwdriver where the black plastic bag in the background isn't as blurred on the OMD compared to the Canon.
That said, if it weren't for the comparison shots, the OMD still does a pretty good job, especially with the 25mm Prime.
4 comments:
Tomorrow compare your bokeh with mine and see the difference.
The x100s sensor is slightly larger than Canon's APS-C sensor so the bokeh in theory should be better than both the Canon and Olympus.
Please test the bokeh in low ISO and bright daylight. A little unfair to test like this cos the noise could be contributing to blurriness of the background. I suspect that the 450D can achieve a more shallow depth of field due to sensor size but the OMD can give you a creamier bokeh.
In your last shot, the OMD seems to give a more pleasing bokeh on the 100plus logo in the foreground. The 450D makes the "100" look a bit harsh instead of being creamy.
I actually thought the 100 text looked more creamy on the 450D, The 100 on the OMD seems to have a more define edge around the font.
Thanks for the pro tip! Luckily I brought the 450D out today, will try and get some samples!
Post a Comment